The anticipated proof, its deficient regulation against the victim's human right to a “non-revictimizing” treatment

Abstract

This article analyzes the practice of early testing in victims of sexual crimes, which is considered founded on the fact that the treatment they carry for their recovery is interrupted when they are summoned again to collect more data related to the crime. In the author's opinion, it is required to expressly establish in article 304 of the National Code of Criminal Procedures that advance evidence be carried out informally by the authorities, in the case of victims of sexual crimes, by virtue of the principles pro-person and superior interest of minor.